These tools competes with

CursorvsKilo Code

AI-native code editor versus Open-source VS Code coding agent with 1.5M users

Compare interactively in Explore →

Choose Cursor when…

  • •You want a full AI-native editor replacing VS Code
  • •You need multi-file agent mode
  • •You work alone or in a small team

Choose Kilo Code when…

  • •You want an open-source VS Code agent with structured Architect/Coder/Debugger modes
  • •You want a built-in MCP marketplace inside your coding agent
  • •You're looking for a battle-tested Cline alternative with 1.5M users

Side-by-side comparison

Field
Cursor
Kilo Code
Category
Coding Assistants
Coding Assistants
Type
Commercial
Open Source
Free Tier
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Pricing Plans
Pro: $20/moBusiness: $40/user/mo
—
GitHub Stars
—
⭐ 28,000
Health
—
●80 — Active

Cursor

VS Code fork with deep AI editing, multi-file context, and a powerful agent mode. The most popular AI editor by mindshare.

Website ↗

Kilo Code

Open-source VS Code extension and superset of Cline + RooCode. Features Architect, Coder, and Debugger modes with a built-in MCP marketplace. Processes 25T tokens in production and ranks #1 coding agent on OpenRouter.

Website ↗GitHub ↗

Shared Connections3 tools both integrate with

ClineClaude CodeMCP SDK (TypeScript)

Only Cursor (22)

WindsurfLangSmithLangfuseLangGraphLlamaIndexQodo (CodiumAI)GitHub CopilotZedAideJetBrains AI Assistant

Only Kilo Code (2)

RooCodeCursor

Explore the full AI landscape

See how Cursor and Kilo Code fit into the bigger picture — 207 tools, 452 relationships, all mapped.

Open in Explore →